Our goal as individuals is the ultimate return to our father – GOD. We love the hero’s journey, because it is the ultimate journey for all of us. Nevertheless, the hero’s journey is classically depicted as one where the son faces and overcomes many challenges in becoming the father, achieving manhood, or earning the respect of some group of people. Thus, anyone who has fought or is fighting the good fight can connect with and be inspired by the hero’s journey. Not that it should be, especially since one of the first stories to depict a hero’s journey is the tale of Isis who fought with skill, cunning, and valor to save her son, Horus. That automatically makes this is a man’s movie. First and foremost, a primary theme in the film is ‘the hero’s journey’. Thus, the best critics are people who love movies, not journalists who get paid to think a certain way or would-be film-makers whose primary focus should be on film-making. Hate to have to say this, but critics are by no means the stand-in experts on movie-making or what makes a good movie. These guys are getting to be like the weather-man who gets it wrong 70% of the time.
And, if the critics are supposed to be giving us the heads-up on what’s good to go see, we cannot find a more clear referendum on their job performance than this.
URSA AFTER EARTH MOVIE MOVIE
Whatever criteria critics are employing in determine whether a movie is worth seeing, it’s obviously not the formula the public is using. What’s interesting is - according to, only 12% of critics liked the movie, whereas 82% of the audience enjoyed it. It is certainly worthy of metaphysical review and analysis. The movie “After Earth” almost forced me to turn the camera back-on – almost. So, I’ve decided to take a break from YouTube and the MetaChannel, but that does not mean I’ve taken a break from “observational metaphysics” or viewing the world in which we live metaphysically.